Art has always been a way to express the views and opinions of the expressive. Many who hope to reach out and expose their feelings use art as a vehicle best fit to do so. In the case of graffiti, seen along many streets across many corners of the globe, normal people can also use it as a way of expressing themselves. It is also an opportunity for the less fortunate, yet no less talented population of the world to have a voice and speak their hearts. The only issue is that its existence is a debatable topic.
As stated in the CBS report, graffiti in most areas is an illegal act. The artists do not have the right to express themselves on property that is not theirs. This has raised many debates as to whether graffiti, in most cases, is ethically correct. With this in mind, curators of recognised the freedom of expression that graffiti artist so desire, and have started exhibitions to lure them from out of the streets, and give them an opportunity to express themselves as a potential career, instead of an illegal action.
I do believe that people deserve to have a voice through art. For the less fortunate especially, this is the only way they are heard in many situations. As for the ethical aspects of graffiti, I do agree that it should be done only to the extent that it is still legal. This shouldn't, however, limit the artists from being able to do what they love. Opportunities, such as exhibitions for graffiti alone, should be guaranteed for ALL people to be able to express themselves. Ethics should not limit them to less that most already have. Graffiti is no less of an art than any other.
As stated in the CBS report, graffiti in most areas is an illegal act. The artists do not have the right to express themselves on property that is not theirs. This has raised many debates as to whether graffiti, in most cases, is ethically correct. With this in mind, curators of recognised the freedom of expression that graffiti artist so desire, and have started exhibitions to lure them from out of the streets, and give them an opportunity to express themselves as a potential career, instead of an illegal action.
I do believe that people deserve to have a voice through art. For the less fortunate especially, this is the only way they are heard in many situations. As for the ethical aspects of graffiti, I do agree that it should be done only to the extent that it is still legal. This shouldn't, however, limit the artists from being able to do what they love. Opportunities, such as exhibitions for graffiti alone, should be guaranteed for ALL people to be able to express themselves. Ethics should not limit them to less that most already have. Graffiti is no less of an art than any other.